On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 20:33 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 19:27:42 +0100:
> > On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 08:23 +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> > > Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > > Philip Martin wrote:
> > > >> Or you could rebuild the current APR with a
> > > >> one-line patch to set ht->seed to 0 in apr_hash.c:apr_hash_make.
> > > >
> > > > I think when subversion receive the result of this apr_function , we
> > > > should do the sort , ie , subversion should not depend on sort or not
> > > > sort of the apr .
> > > >
> > > > So where in source code we have the return of apr function ?
> > >
> > > There is not just one place, there are many places, even within the diff code. Start in subversion/svn/diff-cmd.c, at svn_cl__diff(), and follow the function calls down. For a WC-to-WC diff, these are the main calls:
> > >
> > > svn_cl__diff
> > > |
> > > svn_client_diff[_summarize]6, svn_client_diff[_summarize]_peg2
> > > |
> > > svn_wc_diff6
> > > |
> > > svn_wc__internal_walk_status
> > > |
> > > get_dir_status
> > > |
> > > /* Walk all the children of this directory. */
> > > for (hi = apr_hash_first(subpool, all_children);
> > > hi; hi = apr_hash_next(hi))
> >
> > Thanks, can you do some draft code example ? , how we got apr_hash
> > sorted by name ? with a for which construct a sort_apr_hash ?
>
> Call svn_sort__hash() :-)
Could someone write some code as example , please, I hate try to
visualize .
we already have a svn_sort__hash() or have to do it ?
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
Received on 2012-03-26 21:03:48 CEST