[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1305084 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.8.html

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:52:41 -0400

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 13:35, <danielsh_at_apache.org> wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.8.html Sun Mar 25 17:35:32 2012
>...
> +was not.)  As of 1.7.1 Subversion <a
> +href="http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c?rev=1303070&amp;r1=1303069&amp;r2=1303070&amp;view=diff"
> +>prevents</a> new instances of the corruption, but
> +only as of 1.8.0 does 'svnadmin verify' <a
> +  href="http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c?r1=1304656&amp;r2=1304655&amp;pathrev=1304656"
> +>detect</a> instances of that corruption in the history of a repository.</p>

Do we really want to link people to the *code* from our release notes?
The code doesn't seem very helpful for users.

> +<p>The fix to these issues is simple: perform a dump/load cycle.  (As usual,
> +svnsync can be used instead of dump/load.)  The cycle can be done with any version
> +of Subversion, and after the cycle the repository should be served exclusively by
> +Subversion 1.7.1 and newer (or 1.7.5 and newer) to prevent further instances of the
> +bug from entering the repository.</p>

Huh? Is it 1.7.1, or 1.7.5?

> +<p>See this summary of issue #4129 for more information

Should that link have a .txt or .html on the end?

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2012-03-25 20:53:13 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.