Re: 1.6.18 tarballs up for testing/signing

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Since this is a 1.6.x release there are -dep tarballs
> which should also be signed by those who test them.
> I've run a test build with these dependencies on a Debian Linux system.

I made a slight mistake by putting APR 1.4.6 into the -deps tarball
while the 1.6.x test suite isn't prepared to deal with the APR hash
ordering changes.

Should we re-roll the deps tarball with APR 1.4.5? I'd call this a
packaging bug and re-use the existing version number. Nobody but
myself has signed the -deps tarball yet.

In any case, we'll need to flag the incompatibility with APR 1.4.6
as a known test-suite bug.
Received on 2012-03-24 11:14:36 CET