Re: Compressed Pristines (Design Doc)
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 18:30, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_elego.de> wrote:
> OK, I've had a cruise through now.
> First of all I have to say it's an order of magnitude larger than what
> I'd imagined it would be. That makes the "move it elsewhere" idea I'd
> had less practical than I'd predicted. I'm also not intending to take
> you up on your offer to proxy me to the doc, though thanks for making it.
> Design-wise I'm a bit surprised that the choice ended up being rolling
> a custom file format.
> Thanks for your work.
+1. I believe we should implement compressed pristine in simple way:
just compress pristine files itself, without inventing some new
Received on 2012-03-22 19:02:50 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev