Re: #4129 is reproducible Re: predecessor count for the root node-revision is wrong message

On 03/19/2012 02:24 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
>> Is this problem specific to the FSFS backend?
>
> Yes, I think it is.
>
> For BDB the dag_node_t type in dag.c doesn't have a node_revision
> member. When update_ancestry does svn_fs_bdb__put_node_revision it
> writes to the database and subsequent svn_fs_bdb__get_node_revision will
> see the updated value.
>
> For FSFS the svn_fs_fs__put_node_revision call writes to the
> transactions subdir but the in-memory node_revision doesn't get changed.

Gotcha. Thanks for the response.

I remember when the BDB code had an in-memory node-revision structure and
tried to maintain that using the trail construct. I remember also the day I
purged the code of that mess. :-)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand