Re: Updating local-moves (was: svn commit: r1301390 ...)

On 16.03.2012 15:50, Stephen Butler wrote:
> Some users do want more control over update (i.e., they trust
> Subversion less). Interactive resolution during or after update is an
> interesting scenario.

s/Some/Many/ :)

Somewhat off-topic, but "svn update" has the serious problem that it's
impossible to revert to the state before the update if one had local
changes. Most of these "pick sane defaults" kinds of discussions would
become moot if one could have some kind of client-side snapshot that let
revert be something more than just an all-or-nothing proposition.

-- Brane
Received on 2012-03-16 22:40:50 CET