Re: Possible WC format bump
On Mar 15, 2012 9:22 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On 03/14/2012 02:28 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> > "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
> >> What happens in the opposite case -- that is, when you have a
> >> branch-based working copy and you move something, then use a stable
> >> 1.7 client to access it?
> > The stable 1.7 client will ignore the moved-to/here completely and treat
> > the move as copy+delete.
> > Current trunk will ignore most of moved-to/here create by the branch and
> > will usually treat the move as copy+delete, but it's not ignoring it
> > like 1.7 so I suppose some operations may fail. Similarly while the
> > branch will ignore most moved-to/here created by current trunk I can't
> > be certain it will ignore it in all cases.
> Thanks. Sounds like it's fine to just reintegrate without the format
Already done. r1300933 :-)
Received on 2012-03-15 14:44:03 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev