[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Possible WC format bump

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:43:26 -0400

On Mar 15, 2012 9:22 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2012 02:28 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> > "C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> writes:
> >> What happens in the opposite case -- that is, when you have a
> >> branch-based working copy and you move something, then use a stable
> >> 1.7 client to access it?
> >
> > The stable 1.7 client will ignore the moved-to/here completely and treat
> > the move as copy+delete.
> >
> > Current trunk will ignore most of moved-to/here create by the branch and
> > will usually treat the move as copy+delete, but it's not ignoring it
> > like 1.7 so I suppose some operations may fail. Similarly while the
> > branch will ignore most moved-to/here created by current trunk I can't
> > be certain it will ignore it in all cases.
>
> Thanks. Sounds like it's fine to just reintegrate without the format
bump.

Already done. r1300933 :-)
Received on 2012-03-15 14:44:03 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.