Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Daniel Shahaf <danielsh_at_apache.org> wrote:
>> >>> The release tarballs and signatures can be svn mv'ed from the
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ repository across to the
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/httpd/ repository.
>> >>> <<
>> >>>
>> >>> I've tried using svn mv directly on a test repo (i.e. not using a
>> >>> workspace), and it does not seem to be possible to move multiple files
>> >>> at once.
>> >>>
>> >>> Can I ask for a bit more detail on how you actually do the move?
>
> 1)
> svnmucc -m logmsg -U https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/   \
>        mv dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2         \
>           release/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2     \
>        mv dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2.asc     \
>           release/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2.asc
>
> 2)
> svn mv https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2 \
>       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2.asc \
>       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/
>
> 3)
> svn mv https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/1.7.4/ \
>       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/
>
> 4)
> svn mv https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion/1.7.4/ \
>       https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/subversion/1.7.4/
>
> Does that answer your question?

I work on the same project as you, Daniel, and even for me, that was
certainly.... opaque.

Looks like you are providing four different alternatives to move from
"development review" to "release". Did I get that right?

A bit of exposition would be nice.

Thanks,
-g
Received on 2012-03-03 10:21:08 CET