On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote:
> On 2/27/12 8:34 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>>
>> On 2/27/12 8:32 PM, hwright_at_apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Tue Feb 28 04:32:21 2012
>>> New Revision: 1294455
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294455&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> * tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh:
>>> Update configure args to reflect new java version.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> subversion/trunk/tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh
>>>
>>> Modified: subversion/trunk/tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh
>>> URL:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh?rev=1294455&r1=1294454&r2=1294455&view=diff
>>>
>>>
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- subversion/trunk/tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh
>>> (original)
>>> +++ subversion/trunk/tools/buildbot/slaves/ubuntu-x64/svnbuild.sh Tue Feb
>>> 28
>>> 04:32:21 2012
>>> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ echo "========= autogen.sh"
>>> echo "========= configure"
>>> ./configure --enable-javahl --enable-maintainer-mode \
>>> --without-berkeley-db \
>>> - --with-jdk=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/ \
>>> + --with-jdk=/usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/ \
>>
>>
>>
>> Don't we want to stay on JDK 6 so we don't inadvertently pick up new Java
>> 7
>> features?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. People will be using
Java 7 to attempt to build the JavaHL bindings, so I think it makes
sense to use them on our tests. In fact, this entire thing was
motivated by the fact that I upgraded the slave to the latest Ubuntu
Beta, and discovered it is now shipping Java 7 by default.
> I saw the build failures on the build box. Do we have other build boxes
> with JDK 6?
I don't know.
-Hyrum
--
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com/
Received on 2012-02-28 14:37:20 CET