Re: Status of 1.7.3

Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> Is there any sense of closure on the serf+windows test failure on the
> 1.7.x branch? My sense is that the failure does *not* expose a new
> bug on the branch, but rather smokes out an existing one.

That's my view as well. svnrdump has a bug that causes it to rely on
the server responding to serf's series HTTP requests in a particular
order. It's not a new bug.

> If that is
> the case, I am not opposed with moving forward on a 1.7.3 release on
> the branch as-is, though we'd need to make some kind of note about the
> test failure (or quash it for the time being).
>
> Given the above, I'm inclined to move forward and roll tarballs on
> Friday, if nobody objects too loudly.

+1

-- 
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com