[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Time for 1.6.18?

From: Trent Nelson <trent_at_snakebite.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 22:10:41 -0500

On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:34:48PM -0800, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Trent Nelson wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 15:22:21 -0500:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:39:13AM -0800, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote:
> > > > With a fsfs corruption bug found and fixed this week [1], should we cut a
> > > > 1.6.18?  1.6.17 was tagged 8 months ago.  If we don't cut a new release,
> > > > then we should probably let downstream distributions know about the issue so
> > > > they can patch their builds.
> > >
> > > I've got time this week if folks are interested in this. Any other
> > > pressing items for 1.6.18?
> >
> > Any chance the mergeinfo memory leak fix could be included? This
>
> Merges cleanly to 1.6.x and passes tests. Backported, with Greg's vote.

    Awesome, thanks! Very much appreciated.

        Trent.
Received on 2012-02-07 04:11:34 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.