[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Time for 1.6.18?

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 03:34:48 +0200

Trent Nelson wrote on Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 15:22:21 -0500:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:39:13AM -0800, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Blair Zajac <blair_at_orcaware.com> wrote:
> > > With a fsfs corruption bug found and fixed this week [1], should we cut a
> > > 1.6.18?  1.6.17 was tagged 8 months ago.  If we don't cut a new release,
> > > then we should probably let downstream distributions know about the issue so
> > > they can patch their builds.
> >
> > I've got time this week if folks are interested in this. Any other
> > pressing items for 1.6.18?
>
> Any chance the mergeinfo memory leak fix could be included? This

Merges cleanly to 1.6.x and passes tests. Backported, with Greg's vote.

> issue is severely affecting one of my clients, and they're still
> on 1.6.x at the moment. If it could be included in .18, I won't
> have to patch it manually :-)
>
> Extract from 1.7.x's STATUS log w/ relevant revs below.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r1235929 | danielsh | 2012-01-25 15:36:42 -0500 (Wed, 25 Jan 2012) | 15 lines
>
> Merge the r1235264 group from trunk:
>
> * r1235264, r1235296, r1235302, r1235736
> Fix a swig-py memory leak.
> Justification:
> Seen in the wild with significant effects.
> Notes:
> r1235264 is the fix.
> r1235296 adds a regression test.
> r1235302 is trivial / obvious fix.
> r1235736 is trivial / obvious fix.
> Votes:
> +1: danielsh
> +0: rhuijben
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Regards,
>
> Trent.
Received on 2012-02-07 02:35:36 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.