[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Why do we check the base checksum so often?

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 15:49:10 -0500

On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 15:44, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> On 02/06/2012 03:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> That is certainly an easier approach. "You use the old interface?
>> Fine. You won't get base checksum verification cuz we'll always pass
>> NULL." ... that seems like a fine position to take.
>
> This might be a fine position to take for some third-party consumer of the
> APIs, but I hope you aren't advocating that we toss out such a core data
> integrity check within Subversion itself.  Are you?

Theoretically, we'll be converted over to Ev2 and the compatibility
shim will not be used in our product. Only third-parties who choose to
stick to the old Ev1 (delta editor) interfaces will lose the integrity
check.

Ev2 only has checksums for the resulting content. It uses
path/revision to specify the target of the text change.

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2012-02-06 21:49:43 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.