[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1222522 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:37:59 +0200

Stefan Küng wrote on Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 17:24:51 +0100:
> Then why are there multiple statements like this in the svn code:
> SVN_ERR_ASSERT_NO_RETURN(svn_dirent_is_absolute(local_abspath));
> (example from libsvn_wc\util.c, line 197).

Because the containing function doesn't return svn_error_t.

> That's just one example of many, many more. A simple search for
> SVN_ERR_ASSERT_NO_RETURN will give you an idea. I only found about
> two which I would consider real _NO_RETURN situations. All others
> are completely recoverable.

You have commit access.
Received on 2011-12-24 17:38:45 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.