Re: [PATCH] enabling ruby in the subversion build

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:04:55 +0200

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011, at 18:37, Vincent Batts wrote:
> I will start by working on all of the 'E' errors in the ruby tests
> straight. I primarily want to see these ruby bindings back into the main
> bundle of bindings, now that many distributions are defaulting to ruby
> 1.9.x. Arch linux has followed upstream suite and shipped a subversion
> without ruby bindings.
>
> Should I send a separate patch, or amend the previous?

Please don't send interdiffs; but send patches against trunk_at_HEAD.

Please send separate patches for separate functional changes. Getting
the tests to pass with ruby1.8 would be a separate functional change than
supporting ruby1.9.
Received on 2011-12-19 09:05:32 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "Re: svn commit: r1215273 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_client_private.h libsvn_client/client.h libsvn_client/ra.c svn/cl.h svn/merge-cmd.c svn/mergeinfo-cmd.c svn/util.c"
Previous message: Vincent Batts: "Re: [PATCH] enabling ruby in the subversion build"
In reply to: Vincent Batts: "Re: [PATCH] enabling ruby in the subversion build"
Next in thread: Stefan Sperling: "Re: [PATCH] enabling ruby in the subversion build"
Reply: Stefan Sperling: "Re: [PATCH] enabling ruby in the subversion build"
Reply: Vincent Batts: "Re: [PATCH] enabling ruby in the subversion build"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]