AW: Support for reverse merges?

Hi,

Von: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.foad_at_wandisco.com]
>
> But then I realized that's totally unnecessary. We don't need and
> shouldn't even attempt to record anything other than 'We have change C'
> or 'We don't have change C', for each change 'C'. The only new thing that
> I think we want here is the ability to record 'We don't have change C'
> when C is in our own history; where currently we always assume that we DO
> have each such change.

If you do exactly this, you cross the road between a revision based and a changeset based VCS.

Maybe that is the future of svn, or maybe that is well beyond the scope of svn...

Best regards

Markus Schaber

___________________________
We software Automation.

3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Markus Schaber | Developer
Memminger Str. 151 | 87439 Kempten | Germany | Tel. +49-831-54031-0 | Fax +49-831-54031-50

Email: m.schaber@3s-software.com | Web: http://www.3s-software.com
CoDeSys internet forum: http://forum.3s-software.com
Download CoDeSys sample projects: http://www.3s-software.com/index.shtml?sample_projects

Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915
Received on 2011-08-31 13:28:19 CEST