[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: rc1 is DOA. What now?

From: Hyrum K Wright <hyrum.wright_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:57:28 -0500

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> wrote:
> On 23.08.2011 21:21, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 09:03:15PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> I wonder if it even makes sense to fix this case for upgrade. After all,
>>> we could just tell users to unlock files before upgrading their working
>>> copies.
>> Do you mean that it doesn't need to be fixed, ever?
>> Or that this isn't a critical fix to have in the .0 release?
>
> It isn't critical to fix in the .0 release and not a good enough reason
> to scrap RC1. I'd hesitate to call it a release blocker, after all,
> there's a perfectly good workaround, and AFAIU not the only limitation
> of the upgrader.

Good points.

At this point, I'm ready to run with the consensus, whatever that is.

-Hyrum

-- 
uberSVN: Apache Subversion Made Easy
http://www.uberSVN.com/
Received on 2011-08-23 23:57:57 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.