On Sun, 2011-08-21, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Julian!
>
> Great stuff! :D
>
> Well, I haven't looked at the patch in great detail, but the summary reads
> like honey and cream. Ever since I waded through the diff code years ago
> this task has been on my, er, long-term to-do list... Thanks! :)
>
> Oh but it's not done yet, of course. The "Later we can drive...", does that
> mean you'll continue to work on it in the coming weeks? Or are you off to
> other tasks and it's going to be *a lot* later if it depended on you?
I've got a working patch for enabling WC-WC diff summaries, so I'll
finish that very soon, and I'll probably do WC-repos as well, since I
don't think that can be much more work.
- Julian
> On 08/20/2011 03:56 PM, julianfoad_at_apache.org wrote:
> > Author: julianfoad
> > Date: Sat Aug 20 13:56:52 2011
> > New Revision: 1159880
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1159880&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Change the implementation of 'svn diff --summarize' to use the standard
> > 'diff callbacks' mechanism, so that it may be more easily extended. The
> > summary mode currently supports only repos-repos diffs, and it was reporting
> > the summary results directly from a delta editor drive. Instead, write a
> > set of diff callbacks that produce summary information, and drive them via
> > the existing svn_client__get_diff_editor() for a repos-repos diff. Later we
> > can drive the same diff callbacks from WC-WC and WC-repos diff sources.
> ...
Received on 2011-08-22 10:39:54 CEST