[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [VOTE]: Default http-client for 1.7 Serf or Neon

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:53:32 -0700

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Yet... we have seen bugs crop up over the past week in a number of
> other areas (merge? mod_dav_svn? log? fs txns?). We accept those as
> normal. They're fixed and backported. This is how we should be
> operating on ra_serf, too. There is nothing special about it.


I feel that there are certain folks in the community that are
constantly and actively changing the goal posts.

Every time someone says, "Oh, ra_serf can't do X" or "ra_serf isn't as
fast as ra_neon", we either add those features or significantly beat
the pants off ra_neon. We've been passing all of the functionality
tests for years now - yet nothing we do is ever good enough for some.

I'm still not aware of any issues that we haven't either fixed or have
come up with solutions for. -- justin
Received on 2011-08-12 07:56:46 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.