[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [VOTE]: Default http-client for 1.7 Serf or Neon

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 22:54:56 +0300

Stefan Küng wrote on Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 21:41:42 +0200:
> On 04.08.2011 21:36, Greg Stein wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 15:20, Mark Phippard<markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >>...
> >>vote for their preference. I am not saying that the simple majority
> >>decision of this vote should become the default.
> >
> >Not until I'm convinced to remove my veto. We've discussed several
> >times that the future direction lies with serf, and I believe it is a
> >wrong choice to move us away from that. The issue tracker has not had
> >any serf-related bugs for a while, so there is nothing to indicate
> >"not ready".
> Nothing in the issue tracker is not really an indication of
> stability: many problems I had with serf (and other TSVN users) are
> not reproducible without access to private (non public) servers, so
> I never reported them on this list, and of course I wouldn't know
> what to put in an issue.

If a bug can't be reproduced publicly that doesn't mean it's not a bug.
But if a bug is not reported to dev@ or issues@, that /does/ mean it's
not a bug.

> Stefan
> --
> ___
> oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
> (_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
> \ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
> /_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on 2011-08-04 21:55:38 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.