On 07/13/2011 04:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 15:54:31 -0400:
>> On 07/13/2011 03:46 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> cmpilato_at_apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 19:28:18 -0000:
>>>> * r1146214
>>>> Handle NULL inputs when stringifying svn_checksum_t.
>>>> @@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ Candidate changes:
>>>> Avoids segfaults.
>>>> +1: danielsh
>>>> + -0: cmpilato (problem is with callers, not implementation)
>>> Do you want to convert the 'return NULL;' into an assertion then?
>> Why? (I honestly don't see what's motivating any change at all here.) A
>> segfault in the function because of a NULL pointer deref; a segfault in the
>> caller because it tries to use what should be a string but is actually a
>> NULL (despite the docstring not foretelling this behavior, even); an
>> assert() ... these all look the same to me. :-)
> SVN_ERR_ASSERT, not assert(). I assume that an SVN_ERR_ASSERT is better
> than SIGSEGV.
The function doesn't return an svn_error_t *. So you must either rev it, or
use SVN_ERR_ASSERT_NO_RETURN (which just aborts).
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-07-13 22:05:28 CEST