Re: svn commit: r1140482 - /subversion/branches/svn-bisect/BRANCH-README

Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>> >>+svn bisect start [-rN[:M]]
>> >>+
>> >When we discussed you had a concern that above syntax is different from
>> >the normal svn sub command syntax. Is this finalized?
>> >
>>
>> I wouldn't say it's finalized.. I simply wrote down a spec as a rough draft.
>> I'm sure the community will have some ideas about this. (Like implementing
>> a sub-subcommand interface of some sort.)
>
> I'd say just have a set of long options that are mutually exclusive,
> one for each "subcommand".
>
> svn bisect --start
> svn bisect --good
> etc.
>
> This will be easiest to do with the current argument parsing code, and
> also means people can type things in any order they like (--good -r42,
> or -r42 --good).

Do we really need to use -r to mention revision?

How about --good <rev> --bad <rev> ?

Is this complicated with the existing parser?

Thanks and Regards
Noorul
Received on 2011-06-28 12:08:33 CEST