Re: svn commit: r1138871 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_wc/ tests/libsvn_wc/

On 06/23/2011 10:09 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:59:48AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Now, I'm fine with using something other than "absent" ("omitted",
>> "withheld", ...), but -1 on any terminology that allows the WC to presume to
>> know what it simply cannot.
>
> Julian also suggested "server-excluded". Would that work?

Sure! That would work quite well, actually.

Now, understand that we'd still have "absent" in the RA layers, editor
vtable, etc.. I seem to recall you being somewhat vocal about such
inconsistencies in the past. But maybe we can tweak those things over time,
too, as necessary (editorv2).

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand