[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: serf and sourceforge.net don't get along (was on users@: Re: 1.7.0-alpha1 feedback)

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:17:37 -0400

On 06/22/2011 07:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Bolstridge, Andrew wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 14:51:37 +0000:
>> Absolutely. The first thing to do is provide serf as a 2nd option,
>> make a big song and dance about how great it is, and basically
>> advertise the fact that it is there (from a user perspective).
> Didn't we do it as early as the 1.4 release notes?

Well... not really. We've been referring to ra_serf as an "experimental DAV
access module" for quite some time, as recently in release notes as 1.5 and
certainly with no fanfare then or since.

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2011-06-23 03:18:11 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.