[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.7.0-alpha2 tarballs up for signing / testing

From: Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:14:41 -0400

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> The next in our series of 1.7.0 prereleases is now posted for testing
>>>> and siging: 1.7.0-alpha2.  These are cut from trunk, and the magic rev
>>>> is r1137713.  The buildbots were green at that rev, and all tests pass
>>>> for me locally.  You can find them here:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/
>>>>
>>>> As with the previous alpha release and there are obviously known
>>>> issues (but hopefully fewer of them!)  The purpose is to give
>>>> distributors and downstream consumers a concrete milestone against
>>>> which to test, as well as vet our release processes on ASF
>>>> infrastructure.  As you may expect, these prereleases are intended for
>>>> intrepid users and testers only.
>>>>
>>>> Since 1.7.0-alpha1, I've made a number of changes to the release
>>>> scripts, so please make sure the distribution tarballs contain
>>>> everything you'd expect them to.
>>>>
>>>> I hope to get signatures from folks by the end of Wednesday, June 22,
>>>> and then do the public announcement.  Historically, we've not required
>>>> a full set of signatures for alphas and betas, but it would be nice to
>>>> get at least some coverage besides just my own.  As you send in your
>>>> signature announcement, please note any issues you found with the
>>>> alpha release (these will be included in the public announcement).
>>>> Please send sigs here:
>>>> http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py
>>>>
>>>> -Hyrum
>>>
>>> SUMMARY:
>>> ---------
>>> +1 to release
>>>
>>> VERIFIED:
>>> ---------
>>> Hyrum's sig for
>>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/deploy/subversion-1.7.0-alpha2.zip
>>>
>>> Other than the expected differences in
>>> subversion/include/svn_version.h,
>>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/deploy/subversion-1.7.0-alpha2.zip
>>> is the same as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk@1137713.
>>>
>>> TESTED:
>>> -------
>>> [Release-Build] x[ fsfs | bdb ] x [ file | svn | http (neon) | http (serf) ]
>>> Ruby bindings
>>
>> I forgot to mention that I tested the JavaHL bindings too (which passed).
>
> Didn't your mail include an attachement with a build failure of the
> JavaHL bindings?  I didn't see an explanation in that mail, and not
> I'm curious how you tested the bindings if you couldn't build them.

Sorry about that, it can be ignored. I had problems building the
__JAVAHL_TESTS__ target (and added that to a draft of my original
reply). Then I fixed the problem (well "fix" is a stretch, I cleaned
up all my build artifacts, rebuilt, and everything worked). I just
forgot to remove the attachment.

> -Hyrum
>
Received on 2011-06-22 15:15:16 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.