On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> The next in our series of 1.7.0 prereleases is now posted for testing
>>> and siging: 1.7.0-alpha2. These are cut from trunk, and the magic rev
>>> is r1137713. The buildbots were green at that rev, and all tests pass
>>> for me locally. You can find them here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/
>>>
>>> As with the previous alpha release and there are obviously known
>>> issues (but hopefully fewer of them!) The purpose is to give
>>> distributors and downstream consumers a concrete milestone against
>>> which to test, as well as vet our release processes on ASF
>>> infrastructure. As you may expect, these prereleases are intended for
>>> intrepid users and testers only.
>>>
>>> Since 1.7.0-alpha1, I've made a number of changes to the release
>>> scripts, so please make sure the distribution tarballs contain
>>> everything you'd expect them to.
>>>
>>> I hope to get signatures from folks by the end of Wednesday, June 22,
>>> and then do the public announcement. Historically, we've not required
>>> a full set of signatures for alphas and betas, but it would be nice to
>>> get at least some coverage besides just my own. As you send in your
>>> signature announcement, please note any issues you found with the
>>> alpha release (these will be included in the public announcement).
>>> Please send sigs here:
>>> http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py
>>>
>>> -Hyrum
>>
>> SUMMARY:
>> ---------
>> +1 to release
>>
>> VERIFIED:
>> ---------
>> Hyrum's sig for
>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/deploy/subversion-1.7.0-alpha2.zip
>>
>> Other than the expected differences in
>> subversion/include/svn_version.h,
>> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-alpha2/deploy/subversion-1.7.0-alpha2.zip
>> is the same as https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk@1137713.
>>
>> TESTED:
>> -------
>> [Release-Build] x[ fsfs | bdb ] x [ file | svn | http (neon) | http (serf) ]
>> Ruby bindings
>
> I forgot to mention that I tested the JavaHL bindings too (which passed).
Didn't your mail include an attachement with a build failure of the
JavaHL bindings? I didn't see an explanation in that mail, and not
I'm curious how you tested the bindings if you couldn't build them.
-Hyrum
Received on 2011-06-22 14:40:26 CEST