On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Philip Martin
<philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:
>
>> Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Also, has anyone tested this on an NFS-working copy? Or CIFS?
>>
>> Working copy on NFS, Linux client and server.
>>
>> Checkout using 1.6:
>> Elapsed: 96s CPU: 16s
>>
>> Upgrade using 1.7:
>> Elapsed: 147s CPU: 21s
>>
>> Checkout using 1.7
>> Elapsed: 216s CPU: 26s
>>
>> So upgrade is faster than checkout, but only because checkout is slow.
>
> That's using the sync option on the NFS server. Using async
>
> Checkout using 1.6:
> Elapsed: 73s CPU: 16s
>
> Upgrade using 1.7:
> Elapsed: 113s CPU: 20s
>
> Checkout using 1.7
> Elapsed: 180s CPU: 26s
Wow, that looks pretty bad. Especially the checkout time is a cause
for concern IMHO. That may point to a very significant performance
regression accross the board when working with NFS working copies.
Philip, any chance you can perform a complete test run (comparing 1.6
to trunk) of Mark Phippard's perf testsuite? Or Neels' one?
--
Johan
Received on 2011-06-15 13:19:58 CEST