[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Fresh checkout vs 'svn upgrade': How good is good enough?

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 00:52:34 +0100

Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> writes:
>> Also, has anyone tested this on an NFS-working copy? Or CIFS?
> Working copy on NFS, Linux client and server.
> Checkout using 1.6:
> Elapsed: 96s CPU: 16s
> Upgrade using 1.7:
> Elapsed: 147s CPU: 21s
> Checkout using 1.7
> Elapsed: 216s CPU: 26s
> So upgrade is faster than checkout, but only because checkout is slow.

That's using the sync option on the NFS server. Using async

Checkout using 1.6:
Elapsed: 73s CPU: 16s

Upgrade using 1.7:
Elapsed: 113s CPU: 20s

Checkout using 1.7
Elapsed: 180s CPU: 26s

Received on 2011-06-15 01:53:10 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.