On 29.05.2011 09:54, Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 29, 2011 2:55 AM, "Stefan Küng" <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com
> <mailto:tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
> > On 29.05.2011 04:31, Greg Stein wrote:
> >> On May 28, 2011 1:39 PM, "Stefan Küng" <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com
> >> <mailto:tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com <mailto:tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I did a grep search for those functions, and the only files they
> >> showed up were the headers, no other files contained those function
> >> names. So it's not because of preprocessor conditionals.
> >> >
> >> > I'll wait until tomorrow. If there are no objections until then, I'll
> >> commit a change which removes those.
> >> For the conflict_skel functions, please wrap them in #if 0, rather then
> >> deleting them. We are going to use them for 1.8.
> >> The other two... as you wish.
> > An #if 0 won't help with extractor.py at all. It will still extract
> the functions.
> Eep. Good point.
> > If the functions are needed in 1.8, can't we just add them once
> they're really needed?
> Sure. My concern was just getting them back when needed. I guess we can
> just rely on 'svn log' and track down the right revision.
I've adjusted the TSVN build to remove those functions from the
extractor.py output. So it's not a big deal for me.
But I'm still wondering whether the Windows build for the svn client
works. Can anyone here try it?
If it works, those functions could stay there so you don't have to track
them down again once you need them.
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on 2011-05-29 10:03:38 CEST