Re: bindings in default build? (was: svn commit: r1126985 ...)
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:36:21AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:39, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Wasn't it JavaHL that failed to compile? If we want developers to
> > always compile the Java bindings then why don't we remove it as a
> > separate build target and just make it part of our default?
> You're right. We should probably Just Do This.
> We've gone back and forth on bindings for a long time now. I don't
> really see much of a problem if we just built them by default (any
> bindings that are configured for the local machine, that is).
> Ten years ago? Yeah... compiles weren't exactly speedy. But today?
> Pfft. Compile it all. :-)
> Thoughts, people?
No objections. I already have my build automated to do this.
Except if you do this please provide a way to explicitly turn specific
bindings off at configure time. E.g. JavaHL does *not* build with
threadless APR and I really have no idea how to fix that, I've tried...
Received on 2011-05-24 16:49:14 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev