bindings in default build? (was: svn commit: r1126985 ...)

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:39, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>...
> Wasn't it JavaHL that failed to compile?  If we want developers to
> always compile the Java bindings then why don't we remove it as a
> separate build target and just make it part of our default?

You're right. We should probably Just Do This.

We've gone back and forth on bindings for a long time now. I don't
really see much of a problem if we just built them by default (any
bindings that are configured for the local machine, that is).

Ten years ago? Yeah... compiles weren't exactly speedy. But today?
Pfft. Compile it all. :-)

Thoughts, people?

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2011-05-24 16:36:54 CEST