[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

bindings in default build? (was: svn commit: r1126985 ...)

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:36:21 -0400

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:39, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Wasn't it JavaHL that failed to compile? áIf we want developers to
> always compile the Java bindings then why don't we remove it as a
> separate build target and just make it part of our default?

You're right. We should probably Just Do This.

We've gone back and forth on bindings for a long time now. I don't
really see much of a problem if we just built them by default (any
bindings that are configured for the local machine, that is).

Ten years ago? Yeah... compiles weren't exactly speedy. But today?
Pfft. Compile it all. :-)

Thoughts, people?

Received on 2011-05-24 16:36:54 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.