[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "... first release candidate is expected in August 2011." Really?

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:42:25 +0400

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:37, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:10, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That
>>> also means putting it into the alphas.
>>> You've opened issues to track the showstoppers. If they are fixed, then
>>> we're good.
>> Is it makes sense to release ra_serf in alphas if there are known
>> showstopper bugs?
> I've been using ra_serf for 2.5 years. I have had zero productivity
> problems. I see no reason to assume that people will have problems
> with any release based on ra_serf. You have identified some edge cases
> which we need to fix, but I don't see it as a blocker for an alpha.
Subversion source code tree is relatively small comparing to used by
many Subversion users. You can just try to checkout
subversion/branches folder and see memory exhaustion. Anyway I'm fine
to release ra_serf in alpha even just to prove my point of view :)

Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2011-05-24 06:43:23 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.