On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:37, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:10, Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>...
>>> The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That
>>> also means putting it into the alphas.
>>>
>>> You've opened issues to track the showstoppers. If they are fixed, then
>>> we're good.
>>>
>> Is it makes sense to release ra_serf in alphas if there are known
>> showstopper bugs?
>
> I've been using ra_serf for 2.5 years. I have had zero productivity
> problems. I see no reason to assume that people will have problems
> with any release based on ra_serf. You have identified some edge cases
> which we need to fix, but I don't see it as a blocker for an alpha.
>
Subversion source code tree is relatively small comparing to used by
many Subversion users. You can just try to checkout
subversion/branches folder and see memory exhaustion. Anyway I'm fine
to release ra_serf in alpha even just to prove my point of view :)
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2011-05-24 06:43:23 CEST