On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2011 10:21 PM, "Ivan Zhakov" <ivan_at_visualsvn.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:44, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>...
>> >
>> > I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a
>> > decision to change the defaut and branch without them. As long as we
>> > intend for Serf to remain the default, and as I understand it that is
>> > the intent, we should keep these items in 1.7.0.
>> >
>> >
>> +1, personally I prefer switch back on neon before releasing alphas.
>
> The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That
> also means putting it into the alphas.
>
> You've opened issues to track the showstoppers. If they are fixed, then
> we're good.
>
Is it makes sense to release ra_serf in alphas if there are known
showstopper bugs?
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2011-05-24 06:11:14 CEST