On 2011-05-23 20:25, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>wrote:
>> I do have a question, though, about a portion of that report:
>> The good news is: after the extensive rewrite of Subversion's working
>> copy library has completed, a release branch will be created within a
>> month, and the first release candidate is expected in August 2011.
>> I didn't get the sense at the hackathon that there were enough documented
>> blocker issues to delay our putting out our first release candidate for
>> another *three months*. Did I miss some critical discussion on Friday?
>> I simply misunderstand the discussions we had earlier in the week? Are
>> there some blockers that are living in peoples' minds and *not* in the
>> tracker (aka "poor collaboration and communication")? Was the write-up
>> a mistake, and August is actually the *release* target date?
> I noticed that bit of prose as well, and just chalked it up to
> an overzealous PR guy.
Sorry, it's a mistake alright. The "PR guys" were rushing the PR stuff
on Friday. This bit of incongruous information apparently slipped through.
> The outcome of the hackathon was "we'll start alpha releases in June and
> branch when the blockers are gone"
We'll change that paragraph to read:
The good news is: after the extensive rewrite of Subversion's working
copy library has completed, we can expect alpha releases in June,
to be followed by the creation of a release branch, once the
remaining release blockers have been resolved.
Michael Diers, elego Software Solutions GmbH, http://www.elego.de
Received on 2011-05-24 02:36:45 CEST