[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "... first release candidate is expected in August 2011." Really?

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:44:39 -0400

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 17:03, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> On 05/23/2011 04:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> All non-serf blockers should be fixed before we branch. IOW, we get as
>>> close to a release candidate as possible on trunk. (and if people want
>>> to code new features, they should HIGHLY CONSIDER doing that on a
>>> branch, for later reintegration).
>> Should we, then, move the Serf issues to 1.7-consider in the tracker?
> If you like churning issues... sure.
> I'd kind of like them front-and-center for 1.7.0 queries. But whatevs...

I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a
decision to change the defaut and branch without them. As long as we
intend for Serf to remain the default, and as I understand it that is
the intent, we should keep these items in 1.7.0.

Mark Phippard
Received on 2011-05-23 23:45:06 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.