[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "... first release candidate is expected in August 2011." Really?

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 16:27:51 -0400

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 14:51, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>wrote:
>> On 05/23/2011 02:25 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> > The outcome of the hackathon was "we'll start alpha releases in June and
>> > branch when the blockers are gone"
>> Hrm... that's not quite what I recall.  But then, I remained somewhat
>> under-rested for the duration of the trip.  :-)
>> Our discussion of the default ra-dav implementation for 1.7.0 implied that
>> there could be open "blocker" issues even after we branch.  (Because if any
>> of those blockers were serf-ish, that was our signal to restore ra_neon as
>> the default.)  I hate to fuss over such fine details, but I believe we owe
>> it to ourselves to be clear on this general matter of branching.
> My recollection is that we essentially said that if there are blocking
> ra_serf issues when all the other blockers are gone, we'd flip back to
> ra_neon for the release.  (So in a sense, the ra_serf blockers aren't really
> blockers at all.)


All non-serf blockers should be fixed before we branch. IOW, we get as
close to a release candidate as possible on trunk. (and if people want
to code new features, they should HIGHLY CONSIDER doing that on a
branch, for later reintegration).

Received on 2011-05-23 22:28:18 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.