[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "... first release candidate is expected in August 2011." Really?

From: Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:51:55 -0700

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>wrote:

> On 05/23/2011 02:25 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> > The outcome of the hackathon was "we'll start alpha releases in June and
> > branch when the blockers are gone"
> Hrm... that's not quite what I recall. But then, I remained somewhat
> under-rested for the duration of the trip. :-)
> Our discussion of the default ra-dav implementation for 1.7.0 implied that
> there could be open "blocker" issues even after we branch. (Because if any
> of those blockers were serf-ish, that was our signal to restore ra_neon as
> the default.) I hate to fuss over such fine details, but I believe we owe
> it to ourselves to be clear on this general matter of branching.

My recollection is that we essentially said that if there are blocking
ra_serf issues when all the other blockers are gone, we'd flip back to
ra_neon for the release. (So in a sense, the ra_serf blockers aren't really
blockers at all.)

Received on 2011-05-23 20:52:24 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.