On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 00:54, Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo_at_mobsol.be> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:53 PM, <cmpilato_at_apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Wed May 18 15:53:04 2011
>> New Revision: 1124306
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1124306&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * notes/berlin-11-agenda
>> Add my first-pass notes about the discussions we've had here in
>> Berlin. Others may wish to fill in more of the details as they
>> recall them.
>>
>> Modified:
>> subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>>
>> Modified: subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda?rev=1124306&r1=1124305&r2=1124306&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda (original)
>> +++ subversion/trunk/notes/meetings/berlin-11-agenda Wed May 18 15:53:04
>> 2011
>> @@ -5,12 +5,17 @@ discuss, and make themselves merry.
>>
>> [ should we include an expected attendee list? ]
>>
>> -Potential items for discussion:
>> +POTENTIAL ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
>> +==============================
>> +
>> * Let's finish Subversion 1.7
>> + * Externals discussion
>> * ra_serf issues
>> - Should we leave serf as default http library?
>> - Checkout/update editor memory and performance issues. May be
>> it is worth implementing non-skelta update editor mode in ra_serf.
>> + - Serf request ordering problem when re-submitting for authn.
>>
>
> What is the "serf request ordering problem"? Never heard of any problems
> with that code.
> Lieven
>
I've filled issue 72 in serf issue tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/serf/issues/detail?id=72
I'm not sure should I add an issue for that to Subversion issue tracker too.
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on 2011-05-19 10:39:00 CEST