> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 18 mei 2011 11:16
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev_at_subversion.apache.org; Hyrum K Wright
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1104610 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: props.c wc_db.c wc_db.h
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:11, Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gstein_at_gmail.com]
> >> Sent: woensdag 18 mei 2011 11:07
> >> To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> >> Cc: Hyrum K Wright
> >> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1104610 - in
> >> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: props.c wc_db.c wc_db.h
> >> No, we said if somebody breaks the build, then it can be reverted.
> >> Breaking the tests does not qualify. You were out of line. I just got
> >> telling off people in Lucene-land for this. I also said that if it were
> >> to me, I would warn somebody about the anti social behavior once, and
> >> remove
> >> their commit privs on the second time. It is THAT much of a problem in
> >> community dynamics.
> >> Don't do that again.
> > Does breaking all the property handling code qualify?
> If you felt the changes were interfering with your work, then you can
> always apply a reversion to your local working copy to continue your
> work. Then, when Hyrum got back online, he could figure out what he
> did and how to move it forward.
> For most people, his changes may have had no impact at all.
Well, yesterday afternoon I had 4 individuals asking me in person why their
test were broken, and this was why.
(There was no problem in neon after all).
If I would have committed a change with similar breakage you would have
shouted at me.
And because Hyrum is our release manager, or maybe because he pays you some
checks, you threat him differently?
Received on 2011-05-18 11:21:45 CEST