[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Vetos in 1.6.x branch -- and how they impact trunk

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:17:26 +0200

On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:48:07AM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> There are some vetos in the 1.6.x branch that seem like they are
> questioning the change, not just whether it was a candidate for
> backport. What does that mean for trunk and 1.7? Here are the items
> I am thinking of (leaving out the items that were vetoed only because
> they were not considered appropriate for a fix release):
> * r878078, r878088, r878102, r878196
> Make KWallet window attached to terminal window.
> Justification:
> Without this change, KWallet window can appear behind terminal window
> and is left after killing terminal.
> Votes:
> +1: arfrever
> -0: peters
> -1: rhuijben ("/proc/%ld/stat" is ugly and Linux-specific -
> would just getenv("WINDOWID") work instead?)
> -1: stsp (I've removed the Linux-specific code from trunk in r1002144
> and r1002151, so trunk code only relies on getenv("WINDOWID").
> I would +1 a backport that also merges these revisions).

The above does not affect trunk since the bad code has been removed.
We never updated the backport nomintation to include the revisions
that removed the bad code from trunk.
Received on 2011-05-17 17:18:12 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.