Re: Do we better tolerate obstructed updates?
From: Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:34:22 -0400
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
So how do we resolve this issue? The crux seems to be:
In r959735, some obstruction cases were changed to cause tree conflicts,
It's true that with Neels' changes in r959735 we had some
This seems preferable to the 1.6. behavior where we simply stopped
Are there some wcng subtleties that have not been discussed in this
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.