[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1099193 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_client/deprecated.c libsvn_wc/info.c tests/cmdline/info_tests.py

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 15:24:24 -0400

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 15:04, <hwright_at_apache.org> wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Tue May  3 19:04:24 2011
> New Revision: 1099193
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099193&view=rev
> Log:
> For info, don't fake a completely bogus revision for added nodes, just
> report an invalid revision.
> In updating the tests, I noticed we report "Resource is not under version
> control" in the XML for nodes with invalid revnums.  While this isn't
> strictly true for added nodes, I'll leave that fix for future change.

Eh? Shouldn't those tests be marked with XFail, rather than BAD OUTPUT?

Received on 2011-05-03 21:24:51 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.