On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:43:41PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:30:15AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 07.02.2011 02:52, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > > Note that I didn't run the tests with this patch, so I'm not claiming it
> > > to be bug-free. In fact there's one bug in the recursive proplist of the
> > > WC root, where the root props show up twice -- there's an issue with the
> > > filter in the query there. But it's proof-of-concept after all.
> > Well, I fixed that bug and the new patch is attached. I ran
> > prop_tests.py, and did get one failure (see below); could be a
> > difference in the output (the results of a recursive proplist are
> > ordered now), but I don't plan to investigate that; whoever takes this
> > patch and runs with it is welcome to do so. :)
> Thanks a lot! I'll take a look.
I like this patch a lot and think we should commit it after fixing
the test failure. It seems like temporary tables are the answer to
this problem. I expected this to be too slow, but it's very fast.
Where is the temporary table stored? Is it back by a file or memory?
If backed by memory, do we have to worry about memory consumption for
large working copies?
Received on 2011-02-07 16:53:18 CET