Re: Roadmap : 1.7 Release Status : Test Review : XFails

Hyrum K Wright wrote on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 18:01:02 -0600:
> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Mark Phippard wrote on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:47:14 -0500:
> >> The take-away for me is that if we adopted a convention (or did
> >> something in the test code) to make sure that all XFails were
> >> associated with an issue then it would collectively save the project a
> >> lot of time and effort in understanding the significance of each
> >> XFailing test.  This becomes especially important in the run-ups to
> >> releases.
> >
> > Sounds reasonable to me --- just one place to look at.
>
> Agreed.
>

See r1066709.
Received on 2011-02-03 01:24:26 CET