Re: Roadmap : 1.7 Release Status : Test Review : XFails

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:47:14 -0500:
>> The take-away for me is that if we adopted a convention (or did
>> something in the test code) to make sure that all XFails were
>> associated with an issue then it would collectively save the project a
>> lot of time and effort in understanding the significance of each
>> XFailing test.  This becomes especially important in the run-ups to
>> releases.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me --- just one place to look at.

Agreed.

-Hyrum
Received on 2011-02-03 01:01:41 CET