[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [serf-dev] Re: What stands between us and branching 1.7?

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:06:30 -0800

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, tested with serf from the 0.7.x branch: memory rise is still higher than
> with neon, indicating that there's still some (small) memory leak somewhere.
> But checkouts and updates of even larger projects succeed without using up
> all available memory as before.
> To compare: checkout of the TSVN source including all externals with serf
> uses up about 40MB more RAM than when using neon. I'd say that's ok.

Does the memory keep going up? Or, does it reach a steady point? I'd
expect that ra_serf would use a bit more memory than ra_neon as it has
to manage a lot more than what neon has to do.

As a point of reference, on Mac OS X 10.6, svn 1.6.x with ra_serf
checking out svn trunk peaks at 81MB, while ra_neon peaks at 12MB.

HTH. -- justin
Received on 2011-01-23 18:07:10 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.