[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [serf-dev] Re: What stands between us and branching 1.7?

From: Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:42:21 +0100

On 23.01.2011 16:09, Lieven Govaerts wrote:

> I've used a build from serf trunk for a while now without problems.
> The serf log indicates that r1416 has been merged, but r1417 has
> not. Is there a reason why this memory leak fix hasn't been merged
> to 0.7.x?
> r1417 is part of a refactoring on trunk to move the connection related
> code in a separate bucket (httpconn). I doubt that that code is really
> stable yet, so I'd rather not merge it to 0.7.x.

Ok, tested with serf from the 0.7.x branch: memory rise is still higher
than with neon, indicating that there's still some (small) memory leak
somewhere. But checkouts and updates of even larger projects succeed
without using up all available memory as before.
To compare: checkout of the TSVN source including all externals with
serf uses up about 40MB more RAM than when using neon. I'd say that's ok.


   oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
  (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
    \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
    /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on 2011-01-23 17:43:13 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.