Re: svn commit: r1053461 - /subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Hyrum K Wright <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
>>> +    <category rdf:resource="http://projects.apache.org/category/build-management" />
>>
>> They do not have version control or SCM as a category to use?  I do
>> not think of Build Management as category for Subversion.
>
> From http://projects.apache.org/categories.html:
> build-management        Projects related to building/maintaining source code/websites.
>
> That seems to fit the Subversion bill pretty well.  But if we'd like,
> we can include additional categories as well.

Based on the list of categories, I can see why you chose that one, but
I think we need to create a new category. Subversion is not a build
management tool and it does not make sense to lump it in with Maven,
Ant, Ivy etc.

I think version control is probably the best category, but if the goal
seems to be to find ways to group Apache projects together then maybe
we should add SCM? There are other Apache projects like Maven that
could fit in that category.

We could also add httpd-module as one of our categories. Technically
content and library would also probably be valid, but these are really
all secondary categories IMO.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/