On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:00 PM, <hwright_at_apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010
>> New Revision: 1053461
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1053461&view=rev
>> Log:
>> First hack at a DOAP file for Subversion, as requested by the Powers That Be
>> at the ASF. (But I think it's a Good Thing, too. ;)
>>
>> This was autogenerated by http://projects.apache.org/create.html
>>
>> * publish/doap.rdf:
>> New.
>>
>> Added:
>> subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (with props)
>>
>> Added: subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf?rev=1053461&view=auto
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf (added)
>> +++ subversion/site/publish/doap.rdf Tue Dec 28 22:00:37 2010
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
>> +<?xml version="1.0"?>
>> +<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl"?>
>> +<rdf:RDF xml:lang="en"
>> + xmlns="http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap#"
>> + xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>> + xmlns:asfext="http://projects.apache.org/ns/asfext#"
>> + xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/">
>> +<!--
>> + Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
>> + contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
>> + this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
>> + The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
>> + (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
>> + the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
>> +
>> + http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
>> +
>> + Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
>> + distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
>> + WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
>> + See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
>> + limitations under the License.
>> +-->
>> + <Project rdf:about="http://subversion.apache.org/">
>> + <created>2010-12-28</created>
>> + <license rdf:resource="http://usefulinc.com/doap/licenses/asl20" />
>> + <name>Apache Subversion</name>
>> + <homepage rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/" />
>> + <asfext:pmc rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org" />
>> + <shortdesc>Enterprise-class centralized version control for the masses</shortdesc>
>> + <description>Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.</description>
>> + <bug-database rdf:resource="http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/" />
>
> Couldn't we just use this URL for bug-database?
> http://subversion.apache.org/issue-tracker.html
Sure could. :)
(I'll probably get around to that at some point, but if anybody else
wants to beat me to it, feel free.)
>
>
>> + <mailing-list rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html" />
>> + <download-page rdf:resource="http://subversion.apache.org/source-code.html" />
>> + <programming-language>C</programming-language>
>> + <category rdf:resource="http://projects.apache.org/category/build-management" />
>
> They do not have version control or SCM as a category to use? I do
> not think of Build Management as category for Subversion.
From http://projects.apache.org/categories.html:
build-management Projects related to building/maintaining source code/websites.
That seems to fit the Subversion bill pretty well. But if we'd like,
we can include additional categories as well.
-Hyrum
Received on 2010-12-29 02:14:04 CET