On Mon, 2010-12-13, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Random community nit: The attached log message seems to have little to
> do with email subject of "Input validation observations".
FYI, I'm watching this thread and intend to respond to this patch, which
is one of a series of patches responding to the observations mentioned
in the subject line. But yes, I see what you mean - the subject line no
longer describes the content of these messages well and so it's not easy
for others to follow.
> In the
> future, when sending a new patch to the list, I'd recommend starting a
> new thread, complete with it's own "[PATCH] ..." subject, as
> recommended in the patch submission guidelines. It's more likely to
> get noticed than when it's tacked onto the end of a largely-unrelated
> 40-message thread.
Agreed. Or, in a case like this where the patch is a direct response to
the original thread, I think replying within the thread and changing the
Subject line would be fine. (That would be seen as a new thread by some
mail clients and as part of the same thread by others, but has the
required effect in either case and is simple to do.)
> Anyway, thanks for the work, I just don't want it to get lost. :)
Yup, thanks from me too.
Received on 2010-12-13 17:05:44 CET